Specification
Whether harm can be defined precisely enough to enforce, without stripping away the context that makes it harmful.
Physical AI safety asks whether AI remains governable once its decisions enter a closed loop with a body and the world. Model safety is necessary. Once the model can act, it is not enough.
Whether harm can be defined precisely enough to enforce, without stripping away the context that makes it harmful.
Whether an unsafe consequence can be predicted, with calibrated confidence, before the last moment it can still be prevented.
Every test is finite. The world is not. Whether failures beyond the test can be found, and what passing can ever prove.
Whether any safety guarantee survives an opponent inside the loop.
Which states still admit a way back, and whether the boundary can be found before the machine crosses it.
Which guarantees, if any, survive a change of body, of task, of world, of scale.
Physical AI safety is a stack. Every layer is unfinished.
A position paper that states the six problems formally and defines safety as a state to be maintained, not a verdict to be issued. Problem I.
Standardized evaluations of anticipation and recoverability, scored across embodiments. Problems II, V, and VI.
Runtime monitors and reference implementations that make the benchmark a bar to clear, not a badge to claim. Problems III and IV.
A formal account of physical AI safety as a state to be maintained.
Evaluations of anticipation and recoverability across embodiments.
Runtime monitors and reference implementations that turn evidence into a bar.